TTT's tenth series of local Carbon Conversations began in April with a group of 8 local people. Thanks to all, the sessions have been lively and informative.
The series facilitator Ben has shared a short report of the first two sessions:
"For our first session we had several interesting and far-ranging discussions.
One of them was about what a low-carbon future would look like.
One of them was about what a low-carbon future would look like.
Several
people suggested that everything would be conducted at a much more local
level. But this left us thinking: does this mean we will have to
unravel everything that globalisation has delivered? Is it possible (and
desirable) to dismantle globalisation, or should we aim to retain
aspects of it and go local only in certain ways?
For our
discussion about a low carbon future we spoke about the importance of
having more regulation from government to control carbon emissions,
fossil fuel extraction, etc. But the issue of regulating ourselves was
also raised. How will we regulate our own behaviour? Several people
suggested education and how important that would be in the process."
Adding a thought-provoking example:
- Here's the 'Bosco Verticale', 2 prizewinning towers that have been built in Milan. There's two acres of vegetation - if it was flat on the ground.
- Should individual developers lead on this kind of innovation? Should there be government encouragement? Where do tenants fit in to such plans?
- The architect Stefano Boeri says: "All the plant life helps reduce smog, dampen noise levels, produce oxygen, and regulate temperatures inside the two buildings.
During the winter, sunlight can easily pass through the bare plant life and help heat people's rooms. During the summer, the leaves can block harsh rays from making apartments too hot."
Ben continues his report:
"For session two we discussed carbon reduction in our home energy consumption.
Everyone agreed that the whole process of overhauling your house can
feel very complex and overwhelming. There are so many things one can do,
and most people don't have the technical expertise to understand all
the options thoroughly.
We
discussed the problems of the current housing market and how the energy
rating of a home is often not very important to the people purchasing
it. This is especially true in a housing market like London where people
are just desperate to get on the housing ladder and probably aren't too
concerned about the energy efficiency of a home.
The
issue of being a tenant came up – we noted how there is little
incentive for landlords to renovate their homes if their tenants are
paying the bills.
We
also talked about communicating these issues and how to point out
someone is overfilling the kettle without appearing a nag! You can
tip-toe, or you can just tell someone they're being daft.... (we will
return to the issue of how to communicate climate change in session 6).
Finally,
the question came up of how to make carbon reduction at home glamorous.
Loft conversions are glamorous. But carbon reduction isn't. Or at
least, at the moment. That could change....
There were some positive notes as well.
One
potentially fun way of tackling the issue is by engaging children. If
engaged they could be enthusiastic supporters of carbon reduction, if it
is made fun, and if they have the chance to receive education on the
issue – linking with what we discussed in week one."
Heat loss in a simplified detached house travels in all directions...would you have guessed those percentages?
We'll continue the coverage of this series of meetings, and more information about Carbon Conversations can be found by clicking here.
Get in touch with TTT if you would like notice of when we are offering the 11th series - or get the core of a group together yourself, and we'll find more people and maybe run it in your home!
No comments:
Post a Comment